Why did the system make this decision?
Each autonomous action resolves to a complete decision record. Read it in seconds, not hours. No raw logs required.
Objective
What the system was asked to achieve.
Patch session fixation in /auth/exchange before issuing new JWT.
Evidence
External and internal signals that motivated the decision.
- OWASP A07:2021 — Identification & Authentication Failures
- Audit trace: 14 sessions re-used pre-exchange token in last 30d
- CWE-384: Session Fixation match on auth/exchange.ts:142
Context used
Repository, blast radius, and recent history.
- ›Repository: core-api @ main · commit 4a9c1d2
- ›Service tier: tier-0 (customer-facing auth)
- ›Last deploy: 2026-05-29 09:11 UTC by atlas-1.4
- ›Active sessions: 41,208 · blast radius: high
Reasoning summary
Plain-language explanation of the chosen path.
Token rotation occurs after credential validation but before session_id regeneration, allowing a pre-auth attacker-set session_id to persist post-login. Regenerating session_id atomically with JWT issuance closes the window without breaking existing clients (token shape unchanged).
Alternatives considered
The platform always evaluates multiple paths. Rejections are first-class citizens.
Tests executed
Validation evidence attached to the decision.
- auth.exchange.session-fixation.spec.tspass
- auth.exchange.regression.spec.tspass
- auth.load.10k-concurrent.spec.tspass
- auth.contract.openapi.spec.tspass
